PART II - Did Hanseatic Merchants in Bergen, Norway Provoke a 1362 Norse Expedition to Kensington, Minnesota?

(From back-cover copy of Alice Kehoe's book, "The Kensington Runestone.")

I see that the question of Norse fur traders possibly arriving in Minnesota in 1362 may have much to do with the difference of the men being able to get more, not fewer, furs. The Russian fur trade had been pretty much cut-off to them by the Hanse. An annual ship brought Greenland furs back to Norway, but any other furs would likely need to come from America, traded from natives, instead of through Russians. Here, then, according to Kehoe, seems to be a plausible reason for the 1362 KRS-party's expedition to Minnesota.

So, the Hanse basically invaded Bergen and took over the city and the port and cut the Scandinavians off from their centuries-old, very lucrative trade which had entailed obtaining furs from Northern Russian natives and then taking them to Constantinople. It also entailed both hazardous and lengthy trips but was very profitable when successful.

The Hanse took advantage of the Scandinavians' tremendous population decline from the Black Death, by means of forceful invasion with their army when Scandinavia was still three kingdoms fighting one another. The takeover ended up with the three kingdoms coming together against the "foreign invaders."

So, it appears that the Norse had been put in a position where they were no longer able to deal in valuable Russian furs...so perhaps the best opportunity for obtaining available furs would have entailed getting them from America...by trading directly with natives.

As a couple of asides, I believe that the "hooking together" of the two river systems from the north and from the east is likely the reason for the Norse's interest and layovers in this area, and I think two of the best evidences for Norse visitation to this region--little known about--are the two petroglyphs discovered just across the Minnesota border in South Dakota, depicting a Norse drinking horn and a Norse table knife, as seen on page 118 in Wolter's book, "The Hooked X." (There is also a plethora of Norse stoneholes in the area, such as along the Whetstone River.)

Here, then, are several pages from Kehoe's insightful book, "The Kensington Runestone - Approaching a Research Question Holistically," which I think fully addresses one plausible reason for Norsemen to have arrived in pre-Columbus Minnesota.

Comments

THE SAUK LAKE ALTAR ROCK (Formerly Called The Viking Altar Rock)

The actor Peter Stormare (think "Fargo"), left, and myself visiting the Altar Rock in 2018 to film an episode for the new TV series "Secrets of the Viking Stone." It was shown in 2020 and this year, 2021. Photo taken by Elroy Balgaard. To begin what is known about the Sauk Lake Altar Rock, I would like to point out that this icon of medieval-era Minnesota history seems to be one of a trifecta of icons that all share at least two features; the Sauk Lake Altar Rock, the Kensington Runestone and the Newport Tower all appear to be connected in a medieval setting to Scandinavians and to the Catholic Church. In this sense, then, all three icons tend to lend support to one another's authenticity. Beyond this, I would like to point out that an earlier regional take on the Sauk Lake Altar Rock is now seen by most historians as ill advised...that being the notion that the Altar Rock was visited and it's four stoneholes made by the Sir Paul Knutson party of me

NORWAY LAKE, MINNESOTA: A Medieval "Bardiche" and a Submerged Runestone?

Norway Lake in Minnesota is approximately 50 miles from the small town of Kensington, where the Kensington Runestone (self-dated to 1362) was discovered by an immigrant farmer named Olof Ohman in 1898. I was already aware of a medieval Scandinavian axe that was found in 1908 by a Norway Lake area fisherman named Ole Skaalerub (the axe is presently in a collection of iron weapons at Alexandria's Runestone Museum), but I didn't learn about a possible submerged runestone in the middle of Norway Lake until a few years later, when I came across a September/October 2012 article in the Atlantis Rising Magazine, entitled "Norsemen in Minnesota," with the subtitle " The Kensington Rune Stone Is Not The Only Evidence For A Prehistoric Viking Presence ." The magazine is now defunct, but I have included pertinent portions of the timeless and fascinating article in this presentation about a possible submerged runestone in Norway Lake: Excerpts from the

LOCATING THE SITE OF THE KENSINGTON RUNESTONE MASSACRE--Finding the Elusive "Lake With Two Skerries."

This posting is about solving a mystery. By putting many clues together, I believe I have discovered where the "Lake With Two Skerries" referred to in the inscription carved into the KRS is located. Much of the material contained in this blog presentation was provided to the Minnesota Historical Society a few short years ago, where it is presently archived within the KRS documentation holdings. Not by coincidence, I believe, a medieval Scandinavian battle axe was found in 1894 (four years before the KRS was unearthed), a foot and a half deep on the west bank of Davidson Lake, which is about one day's journey north from Runestone Hill. My belief is that the exact finding spot of the battle axe helps to verify--like a time capsule--where the KRS campsite was likely located by this lake with two small islands. In its inscription, the KRS indicates that a bloody massacre occurred where the men were camped by this lake. My purpose in this blog posting is to help corrob

THE KENSINGTON RUNESTONE: Commentary and Speculation by Bob Voyles

Search This Blog