Skip to main content

Medieval Norse Waterways From Lake Superior to Runestone Hill

 


     The little white label at the top of this map reads "Brule River outflow."  For those who believe the Kensington Runestone and its message are authentic, this discharge of the Brule River into Lake Superior near Duluth may be marking the spot where ten Norsemen were assigned to wait and watch over the group's boat (or boats), now that westward sailing on Lake Superior was over.  From now on, smaller boats would be in order...likely Native American birchbark canoes.  The reduced group of twenty Norsemen, probably accompanied by Native Americans, would now proceed upstream, southward, toward the St. Croix River and a famous portage--the Brule-St. Croix portage.  In part, one plaque at the portage reads:

"...a continental divide separates the watersheds of the Brule and St. Croix Rivers.  The Brule flows north to Lake Superior and the St. Croix flows southerly to the Mississippi.  A time worn trail connects the navigable portions of these two rivers."

Please note that I have taken the liberty of assuming that isostatic rebound in this specific region during the past several hundred years was likely not significant enough to have prevented this "time worn portage" from being used by the KRS team of adventurers.  Generally speaking, isostatic rebound was greater going northward, where the ice was thicker.





Upon reaching the Mississippi, the men would turn to the right, northward, and travel a short distance to the Minnesota River.  Here they began following the Minnesota River south and west, avoiding the Falls of St. Anthony (and portage) on the Mississippi.



Now, we should do some simple calculations and guesswork to see if we're in the ballpark for thinking that the KRS party may have come to Runestone Hill from Lake Superior rather than from Hudson Bay...although the latter is a popular viewpoint, too, thanks to H. Holand and his amazing King Magnus search party convictions.  For me, it is simply a matter of believing that the group was traveling generally westward, from Vinland on America's East Coast, as the carved inscription indicates.

So, I am proposing fourteen days of travel by rivers, from the Brule River outflow at Lake Superior (where the ten men waited with a boat or boats) to Runestone Hill.  Besides the single aforementioned portage, there is also the four-mile walk to Runestone Hill from the Chippewa River.  But first, we must measure the approximate distance in miles, not just by days of travel.  I have map-measured the entire waterway a few times and have come to believe that it is roughly four hundred miles.

I have purposely avoided figuring times or distances by "saltwater sailing" reckoning.  In other words, I am going by how long it actually would take to travel the river-route, in real terms and conditions, not from open-water sailing calculations.  Generally speaking, a person doesn't sail on rivers.  Obviously, river travel can sometimes be quite slow, especially when traveling upstream, and usually, the larger the river, the easier and faster it is to paddle.  As an example, it is much easier to paddle the Minnesota River than it is to paddle the St. Croix River, or the Chippewa River.  Some days, many miles could be covered quite easily, and other days the pace might be painstakingly slow. 

So, we must somehow come to a reasonable and agreeable average number of miles traveled in an average day of river traveling...for fourteen days, as the KRS stipulates.  Covering roughly four hundred miles in fourteen days comes out to about twenty-eight miles per day.  The question is, does this sound about right for theorizing that the KRS party may have arrived at Runestone Hill by way of the Great Lakes?  Personally, I think an average of twenty-eight miles per day is within the range of good reasoning and guesswork.  (I can only hope that you may agree.) 

I guess someone--or a group of persons--could always reenact the canoe trip from the Brule River outflow to Runestone Hill, to see how long it would take.  The St. Croix River is exceedingly beautiful and many people enjoy canoeing on it.  The Minnesota River is a different story.  Again, the reenactment group would simply be looking for a "ballpark guess-timate" that might possibly give some indication about whether the KRS party was likely to have come to Runestone Hill by way of Lake Superior, as the KRS inscription seems to be saying with the words:  "...west from Vinland."


                  Norse Sailing Ship, Copper Harbor, Michigan, Lake Superior

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE SAUK LAKE ALTAR ROCK (Formerly Called The Viking Altar Rock)

The actor Peter Stormare (think "Fargo"), left, and myself visiting the Altar Rock in 2018 to film an episode for the new TV series "Secrets of the Viking Stone."   It was shown in 2020 and this year, 2021.  Photo taken by Elroy Balgaard. To begin what is known about the Sauk Lake Altar Rock, I would like to point out that this icon of medieval-era Minnesota history seems to be one of a trifecta of icons that all share at least two features; the Sauk Lake Altar Rock, the Kensington Runestone and the Newport Tower all appear to be connected in a medieval setting to Scandinavians and to the Catholic Church.  In this sense, then, all three icons tend to lend support to one another's authenticity. Beyond this, I would like to point out that an earlier regional take on the Sauk Lake Altar Rock is now seen by most historians as ill advised...that being the notion that the Altar Rock was visited and it's four stoneholes made by the Sir Paul Knutson party of me...
12 comments
Read more

NORWAY LAKE, MINNESOTA: A Medieval "Bardiche" and a Submerged Runestone?

Norway Lake in Minnesota is approximately 50 miles from the small town of Kensington, where the Kensington Runestone (self-dated to 1362) was discovered by an immigrant farmer named Olof Ohman in 1898.  I was already aware of a medieval Scandinavian axe that was found in 1908 by a Norway Lake area fisherman named Ole Skaalerub (the axe is presently in a collection of iron weapons at Alexandria's Runestone Museum), but I didn't learn about a possible submerged runestone in the middle of Norway Lake until a few years later, when I came across a September/October 2012 article in the Atlantis Rising Magazine, entitled "Norsemen in Minnesota," with the subtitle  " The Kensington Rune Stone Is Not The Only Evidence For A Prehistoric Viking Presence ."  The magazine is now defunct, but I have included pertinent portions of the timeless and fascinating article in this presentation about a possible submerged runestone in Norway Lake: Excerpts from the ...
2 comments
Read more

THE NORSE CODE-STONES

This blog post is about a puzzling occurrence involving stoneholes chiseled into rocks, I believe in both the pioneering days of the late 1800s and in medieval times, perhaps as early as the 12th century.  This multiple stonehole-making happened near the border of Minnesota and South Dakota, near the town of Appleton, in Minnesota.  It is my firm belief that the stoneholes were chiseled out to mark a spot of earth along a ridgeline directly south of the Pomme de Terre River, a river that empties into the Minnesota River, not far from where the Minnesota river begins near the bottom of Big Stone Lake.  Significantly, the Pomme de Terre River reaches the farthest north of any river discharging into the Minnesota River.  This is important because I think the Norse Code-stone may possibly have been created to indicate an attempted medieval Scandinavian land-claim, and placing the seemingly encoded stonehole rocks by the Pomme de Terre River might have been inte...
2 comments
Read more